Volume 34, Issue 69 (2026)                   J Tax Res 2026, 34(69): 7-42 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

heidari haratemeh M. Investigating the Impact of Personal Characteristics on the Tax Culture with the moderating effect of Perception of Tax System Fairness. J Tax Res 2026; 34 (69) :7-42
URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2318-en.html
Islamic Azad University Naraq branch , M.heidarih@iau.ac.ir
Abstract:   (410 Views)

Background and Purpose: In order to examine the relationship between a person's Personal Characteristics and his tax culture, the Personal Characteristics of that person, who have an abstract, long-term motivational goal and reflect his principles and beliefs about what is important to him in life, and an important role in people's motivation to make decisions and Has moral behavior, Za considered. On the other hand, the tax system is a set of important factors in understanding the personal tax culture, including tax evasion, tax compliance, and the tax system. Tax evasion means violating legal regulations, tax compliance means convincing the taxpayer to act and fulfill tax obligations according to the law, which is a problematic and complex issue.  In relation to the tax system, a moderating variable, i.e. the individual's understanding of the fairness of the tax system, is considered in the model.  Therefore, the purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of Personal Characteristics on personal tax culture with the moderating role of understanding the fairness of the tax system.

 

Methodology: The current research is practical in terms of its purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population includes all knowledge-based and technological companies in Isfahan Scientific & Research Town. Data collection tool, a  questionnaire was distributed online and 420 questionnaires were collected, and with only 390 cases that are valid for analysis due to data screening that included missing data,were finalized for analysis. SEM (CB-SEM) and CFA methods, respectively, to determine structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis using SPSS and AMOS software; And Process software was used to path analysis to estimate the different indirect effects, and finally bootstrapping method was used for moderate effects.

 

Findings: Among the elements of Personal Characteristics; direct and indirect conservatism despite the moderating factor; Understanding the fairness of the tax system has the greatest impact on the personal tax culture and its components. This finding is not far from expected because it seems that people are probably conservative due to the fear of heavy fines, lack of exemptions and loss of credit in the tax system.  In fact, coercion and coercion resulting from the legality of paying taxes and the conservatism and risk aversion of income owners and economic businesses as taxpayers, despite the progress and development of tax culture, will have the greatest impact. components; Openness to change, tax evasion and tax compliance are in the next categories.

 

Full-Text [PDF 703 kb]   (187 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Economic
Received: 2025/06/17 | Accepted: 2025/11/23 | Published: 2026/05/31

References
1. Ahmed, E. & Braithwaite, V. (2015). A need for emotionally intelligent policy: Linking tax evasion with higher education funding. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X37263 [DOI:10.1348/135532505X37263.]
2. Alleyne, P., et al. (2013). Examining Personal Characteristics and ethical behaviour perceptions between accounting and non-accounting students in the Caribbean. The Accounting Educators Journal, 23, 47-70.
3. Andreas, Savitri E. (2015). The effect of tax socialization, tax knowledge, expediency of tax ID number and service quality on taxpayers' compliance with taxpayers' awareness as mediating variables. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 163-169. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.024 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.024]
4. Bagozzi, R.; Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 16, 74-94. [DOI:10.1007/BF02723327]
5. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (10), 1207-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602 [DOI:10.1177/0146167203254602.]
6. Byrne, B.(2013). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: "Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming"; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK. [DOI:10.4324/9780203807644]
7. Chukwuemeka, O.W.; Onuoha, B.C.(2018). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage of fast foods restaurants. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Ad-Minist. 4, 7-14. [DOI:10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.43.1001]
8. Feldman, G., Manchi Chao M., Farh J. L. & Bardi A. (2015). The motivation and inhibition of breaking rules: Personal Characteristics structures predict unethicality. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.003.]
9. Fischer, R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2012). Are cultural values the same as the values of individuals? An examination of similarities in personal, social and cultural value structures. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 12(2), 157-170. https://doi. org/10.1177/1470595812439867. [DOI:10.1177/1470595812439867]
10. Hair, J.; Black,W.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R.; Tatham, R.(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
11. Hayes, A.F.(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford, 692. Available online: http://dm.darden.virginia.edu/ResearchMethods/Templates.pdf.
12. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Cultures consequences: International differences in work-related values. In Bevery Hills. CA: Sage Publications. Jackson, B. R., & Milliron, V. C. (1986). Tax Compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125-165.
13. Holbert, R.L.; Stephenson, M.T.(2003). The importance of indirect effects in media effects research: Testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 47, 556-572. [DOI:10.1207/s15506878jobem4704_5]
14. Kastlunger B., Dressler S. G., Kirchler E., Mittone L., Voracek. (2010). Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 542-552. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.015. [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.015]
15. Kline, R.(2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA. 61.
16. Korndörfer, M. (2014). Measuring and explaining tax evasion: Improving self-reports using the crosswisse model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 18-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2014.08.001]
17. Kornhauser, M. E. (2007). Normative and cognitive aspecs of tax compliance. Literature review and recommendations for the IRS regarding individual taxpayers. Annual Report to Congress 138. National Taxpayer Advocate, 2, 138-180.
18. Litina, A., & Palivos, T. (2016). Corruption, tax evasion and social values. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 124, 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.017.]
19. McGee W. Robert. (2005a). The ethics of tax evasion: A survey of Guatemalan opinion. In: Taxation and Public Finance in Transition and Developing Economies (pp. 481-895). Springer: Boston. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-25712-9_25]
20. McGee, W. R. (2005b). The ethics of tax evasion: A survey of Romanian business students and faculty. In: Accounting and Financial Systems Reform in Eastern Europe and Asia (pp. 299-334). Springer: Boston. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.813345 [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.813345.]
21. McGee, W. R. (2006). Tax evasion in Armenia: An empirical study. Social Science Research Network - SSRN, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869309 [DOI:10.2139/ ssrn.869309.]
22. McGee, W. R. (2006a). The ethics of tax evasion: A survey of Bosnian opinion. Social Science Research Network - SSRN, 2006. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.899609]
23. McGee, W. R. (2007). Ethics, tax evasion and age: Empirical studies of opinion in Utah and 14 countries in the Western Hemisphere. Social Science Research Network - SSRN, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960114 [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.960114.]
24. Nerre, B. (2001). The concept of tax culture. Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association. 94, 288-295.
25. Pickhardt, M. (2014). Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion - A survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.006 [DOI:10.1016/j. joep.2013.08.006.]
26. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P.(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol, 88, 879-903. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879]
27. Richardson, G. (2006). Determinants of tax evasion: A cross-country investigation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15 (2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.005.]
28. Richardson, G. (2007). The influence of culture on tax systems internationally: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of International Accounting Research, 6 (1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2007.6.1.57 [DOI:10.2308/jiar.2007.6.1.57.]
29. Richardson, G. (2008). The relationship between culture and tax evasion across countries: Additional evidence and extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17 (2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.07.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.07.002.]
30. Saad, N. (2014). Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers' view. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1069-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.590 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.590.]
31. Schumacker, R.; Lomax, R.(2010). A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling; Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
32. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure values: Theoretical advances and empirical test in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (1), 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 [DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.]
33. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.]
34. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (3), 268-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002 [DOI:10.1177/0022022101032003002.]
35. Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 307-319. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396925. [DOI:10.1177/0022022110396925]
36. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overviw of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20. https:// doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116. [DOI:10.9707/2307-0919.1116]
37. Torgler, B. (2003). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal od Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00040-4 [DOI:10.1016/ S1053-5357(03)00040-4.]
38. Tsakumis, T. G. et al. (2007). The relationship between culture and tax evasion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2007.06.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2007.06.004.]
39. Vauclair, C. M., et al. (2015). What kinds of value motives guide people in their moral attitudes? The role of personal and prescriptive values at the culture level and individual level. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(2), 211-228. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022022114557487. [DOI:10.1177/0022022114557487]
40. Webley, P., Cole, M. & Eidjar, O. P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00026-5 [DOI:10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00026-5.]
41. Woro Damayanti, T., Sutrisno, Subekti, I. & Baridwan, Z. (2015). Trust and uncertainty orientation: An effort to create tax compliance in a social psychology framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 938-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.124 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.124.]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Tax Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb