- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
دوره 32، شماره 63 - ( 1403 )                   جلد 32 شماره 63 صفحات 114-76 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Torkashvan Z, Alborz M, Torabi T, Askari A. The Effect of Changing the Tax System on Macroeconomic Variables with the System Dynamics Approach. J Tax Res 2024; 32 (63) :76-114
URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2459-fa.html
ترکاشوند زهرا، البرزی محمود، ترابی تقی، عسکری علی. اثر تغییر سیستم مالیاتی بر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی با رویکرد پویایی سیستم. پژوهشنامه مالیات. 1403; 32 (63) :76-114

URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2459-fa.html


1- ، mahmood_alborzi@yahoo.com
چکیده:   (2179 مشاهده)

Tax revenues are superior to other sources of income from the domestic economy for many reasons, including controllability. The current conditions of the Iranian economy and the imposed economic sanctions, as well as the instability of oil prices and oil revenues, have led to the failure to realize the government's revenue plans, and if this trend continues in the long term, the country will face an economic crisis. One of the challenges of the failure to realize the aforementioned plans is the unexpected behaviors that the economic system exhibits over time. In this article, the system dynamics approach, which is capable of displaying a multi-loop and multi-state structure and can model nonlinear feedbacks and time delays, has been used. The main objective of this article is to examine the variables of the tax system on macroeconomic variables, including the inflation rate, unemployment rate, and GDP growth rate, and to present a model for increasing tax revenue, which leads to the selection of the best strategy for improving tax revenue. For this purpose, for a ten-year period (from 1395 to 1404), first the flow-accumulation diagram was drawn and in the next stage the validity of the model built from a dynamic perspective was tested. It is important to state that the variables of this study were selected by considering the subsystems intended by the researchers and the presented model can only be developed and implemented in this system. In other words, in the process of selecting and defining variables, it should be noted that taxes are collected in different bases and sources, and some of these bases and sources have a direct relationship with some economic variables and some have an inverse relationship, and the elasticity of each is also different, so the same variables cannot be used for all bases and sources. After simulating the model and analyzing the applied policies, a valid model with an improved policy structure was obtained for which various scenarios for the future were defined. Thus, optimistic, pessimistic and realistic scenarios have been considered and finally 23 strategies for improving the tax system have been presented, the adoption of each strategy affects the performance of the tax system and some macroeconomic variables. The Tax Affairs Organization, considering the economic conditions of the country and its valuable human resources, can adopt an appropriate strategy or a combination of them and improve the country's tax revenue situation.
 

متن کامل [PDF 507 kb]   (1092 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: مدیریتی
دریافت: 1403/2/2 | پذیرش: 1403/7/23 | انتشار: 1403/9/10

فهرست منابع
1. پژویان، جمشید. (1384). اقتصاد بخش عمومی (مالیاتها) . چاپ دوم. تهران: تربیت مدرس
2. ترکاشوند، زهرا, ترابی، تقی, البرزی، محمود, عسکری، علی. اولویت بندی راهکارهای افزایش درآمد مالیاتی با استفاده از تکنیک دیماتل فازی. پژوهشنامه مالیات. ۱۳۹۷; ۲۵ (۳۶) :۱۰۷-۱۳۴
3. جعفری صمیمی، احمد. (1385). اقتصاد بخش عمومی 1. چاپ هشتم. تهران : سمت.
4. حمیدی، محمدرضا. (1394). پویای‌های سیستم. انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
5. دادخواه، هادی, بخشی دستجردی, رسول، مروتی شریف آبادی, علی. مدل‌سازی سیستم پویای مالیات بر ارزش زمین در اقتصاد ایران. مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی،(1393). (3) 49: 499-521.
6. رضائی ابراهیم. سیاست گذاری مؤثر مالیاتی در بستر ادوار تجاری. پژوهشنامه مالیات. ۱۳۹۵; ۲۴ (۲۹) :۱۶۳-۱۳۱. URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-818-fa.html
7. زراءنژاد، منصور؛ تبعه ایزدی،امین؛ حسین پور، فاطمه. (پ 1393). بررسی و اندازه گیری تأثیر درآمدهای نفتی بر درآمدهای مالیاتی در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، (72)، 111 تا 137.
8. زنجانی، ولی مقدم؛ دهقانی، علی،(1386)، مالیه عمومی و خط مشی مالی دولت. تهران: انتشارات ترمه، ص 179-176.
9. فلیحی ، نعمت، )زمستان 1387)، بررسي اثرات آموزش عالي بر رشد اقتصادي کشور: تلفيق الگوهاي سيستم ديناميکي و الگوهاي اقتصاد سنجی، 2 (5): 53-79.
10. Abdelhafidh, S. Potential financing sources of investment and economic growth in North African countries: A causality analysis. (2013). Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(1), 150-169. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.01.001]
11. Burgress, R., Stern, N. Taxation and Development. (1992) London (London School of Economics)
12. Center for Tax Training, Research and Planing. (2017). Comparative Study of Tax Systems. Tehran.
13. De Cesare, L., & Sportelli, M. A dynamic IS-LM model with delayed taxation revenues. (2005). Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 25(1), 233-244. [DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.044]
14. Eichhorn, C. The Implications of Tax Evasion for Economic Growth. (2004). Mimeo, Department of Economics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich
15. García-Peñalosa, C., Turnovsky, S.J. Taxation and Income Distribution Dynamics in a Neoclassical Growth Model. (2011). Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(8), 1543-1577. [DOI:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00458.x]
16. Govinda, Rao. Tax Reform in India: Achievements and Challenges. (2000). Asia-Pacific Development Journal, Vol 7, No.2.
17. Guo, J., Hao, A., & Ren, Y. Design optimization of real estate tax and effect analysis in China. (2014). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 7(2), 532-545 [DOI:10.3926/jiem.1015]
18. Hamdi, H & Sbia, R. Dynamic relationships between oil revenues, government spending and economic growth in an oil-dependent economy. (2013). Economic Modelling, 35, 118-125. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.043]
19. Harberger, Arnold. Principles of Taxation Applied to Developing Countries: What Have We Learned in Michael Boskin and Charles McLure, (1990). Jr.eds. World Tax Reform: Case Studies of Developed and Developing Countries (San Francisco, ICS Press), 25-46.
20. Hazarati, M., Bafandeh Zendeh, A., Aali, S. Modeling of Real Estate Income Tax: System Dynamics Approach ,(2021). Journal of Money and Economy Vol. 15, No. 4,. 463 -487 [DOI:10.52547/jme.15.4.463]
21. Jenkins, G. P. & Kuo, C. Y. A VAT revenue simulation model for tax reform in developing countries. (2000). World Development, 28(4), 763-774. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00144-8]
22. Kassa, E. T. Factors influencing taxpayers to engage in tax evasion: evidence from Woldia City administration micro, small, and large enterprise taxpayers. (2021). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10.No(1). [DOI:10.1186/s13731-020-00142-4]
23. Lima, Francisco W. S. Controlling the Tax Evasion Dynamics via Majority-Vote Model on Various Topologies. (2012). Theoretical Economics Letters, (2), 87-93. [DOI:10.4236/tel.2012.21017]
24. Lin, W.Z and C.C Yang. A Dynamic Portfolio Choice Model of Tax Evasion: Comparat ive Stat ics of Tax Rates and its Implication for Economic Growth, (2001). Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 25, Issue 11, 1827-1840 [DOI:10.1016/S0165-1889(99)00081-0]
25. Liu, C. Y., & Wang, W. T. System dynamics approach to simulation of tax policy for traditional and internet phone services. (2005). In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston.
26. Mathewos, M. Measuring Customer's Perception Towards Electronic Tax ‎Filing System in Ethiopia: The‏ ‏Case of Large Tax Payer Office at Addis Ababa city ‎administration.‎ ‎(2017). ‎African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, (14), No. 7.
27. Merkulova, T.;Bitkova, T. Tax Evasion and Tax Behavior Efficiency: A System Dynamics Approach. Economic Cybernetics. (2013). International scientific journal, 1 (3), 79-81.
28. Niepelt, Dirk. Tax Evasion Dynamics. Seminar Paper. (2003). Institute for International Economic Studies S-106 91 Stockholm Sweden No. 721.
29. Parsa O A, Mehrkam M, Hesni Moghadam F. The Impact of Economic Sanctions and Political Relations with Emphasis on Earnings and Tax Gaps: A Test of Political Economy Theory. J Tax Res (2021); 28 (48) :83-108. URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-1926-fa.html
30. Papachristos, G., & Vasilopoulos, C. The shift to land value taxation: A tale of a different future. (2013). In R. Eberlein, & IJ. Martinez-Moyano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference of the System Dynamics Society (pp. 1-11).
31. Radianti, Jaziar. Modeling Government External Debt and Sustainability of Fiscal Policy, (2004). conference: The 2004 International System Dynamics Conference At: Oxford, United Kingdom
32. Sameti, M., Azarbayejani, K.,Basirat,M., Seyedsalehi, Sh. Tax Dynamic Analysis in a Small Open Oil Exporter Economy Using Neuro - Fuzzy Systems. J Tax. (2020). 27 (44) :101-125 URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-1783-fa.html [DOI:10.29252/taxjournal.27.44.101]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


./files/site1/images/%D8%B3%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%85_%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B1.pngبازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به پژوهشنامه مالیات می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Tax Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb