Volume 33, Issue 65 (2025)                   J Tax Res 2025, 33(65): 133-169 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nikkhooymatin A, Dehghan S, Noori M. Introducing the ranking model of taxpayers in Iran. J Tax Res 2025; 33 (65) :133-169
URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2437-en.html
1- , s.dehghan@tax.gov.ir
Abstract:   (73 Views)
Ranking of taxpayers is an effective tool in managing taxpayers' tax compliance and saving the time and cost of tax collection, which is of particular importance and priority in a modern tax organization. Although there are legal articles (97 and 219) in Iran's Direct Taxes Act for the assessment of taxpayers, due to the lack of specific indicators, the necessary sufficiency has not been achieved to rank all taxpayers. Therefore, in this article, the desired criteria and indicators have been introduced, followed by the appropriate technique for rating taxpayers. The introduced indicators are divided into four categories: taxpayers', functional, financial and macro tasks. Hierarchical analysis method will also be used for ranking. At the end and after the introduction of the desired facilities for taxpayers with top ratings, the use of behavioral  insights (Nudge) will be used to reflect the results to the taxpayers and improve their ranking.
Full-Text [PDF 820 kb]   (17 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Management
Received: 2024/11/2 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | Published: 2025/05/31

References
1. دستورالعمل امتیازدهی به ناشران اوراق بهادار پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و فرابورس ایران (1402). مصوب 16/11/1402 هیأت مدیره سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار.
2. دستورالعمل فعالان اقتصادی برگزیده گمرکی. (1402). ابلاغ در تاریخ 29/02/1402.
3. دهقان، سحر، موسوی جهرمی، یگانه، و عبدلی، قهرمان. (1397). تئوري چشم انداز؛ رهيافتي نوين در توضيح پديده فرار مالياتي. مجله تحقيقات اقتصادي، 53(1)، 1-23.
4. قانون بودجه کشور. (1403).
5. قانون مالیات¬های مستقیم و اصلاحات پس از آن. (1394).
6. قانون مالیات بر ارزش افزوده. (1400).
7. قانون پایانه فروشگاهی و سامانه مؤدیان. (1398).
8. قدسی¬پور، حسن. (1392). مباحثی در تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره برنامه‌ریزی چند هدفه (روش‌های وزن‌دهی بعد از حل). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر.
9. مرزبان، احسان. (1394). اولویت¬بندي عوامل مؤثر بر ارتقاي مدیریت تمکین در الگوي توسعه مدیریت نظام مالیاتی. نهمین همایش سیاست‌های مالی و مالیاتی ایران، تهران، ایران.
10. موسوی جهرمی، یگانه، عبدی، محمدرضا، و دهقان، سحر. (1397). رتبه‌بندی موافقت‌نامه‌های اجتناب از اخذ مالیات مضاعف ایران. فصلنامه سیاست‌های مالی واقتصادی، ۶(۲۱)، ۱۳۵-۱۵۷.
11. مهرگان، محمدرضا. (1399). مدل‌های تصمیم‌گیری با اهداف چندگانه. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
12. Salayová, M. (2021). Amendments to the Tax Code in Slovakia. News Flash, Accace Slovakia, January 1, 1-4.
13. Zhang, Z. (2022). China's Taxpayer Credit Rating System. Retrieved from china-briefing.com
14. Devos, K. (2004). Penalties and Sanctions for Taxation Offences in Selected Anglo-Saxon Countries: Implications for Taxpayer Compliance and Tax Policy. Revenue Law Journal, 14(14), 32-73. [DOI:10.53300/001c.6656]
15. Li, L., Yu, H., Wang, C., & Fu, Y. (2022). Reward and Punishment Mechanism, Tax Compliance and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on Tax Credit Management System. Economic Research Journal, 55(06), 89-104 [in Chinese].
16. Miłaszewicz, D. (2022). Survey Results on Using Nudges for Choice of Green-Energy Supplier. Energies, 15(7), 2679. [DOI:10.3390/en15072679]
17. Mota, E. (2017). A Proposal for a Taxpayer Rating System to Improve Tax Compliance (Doctoral Dissertation). Columbia University, New York.
18. Information On Taxpayer Classification. (2022). National Tax and Customs Administration, Hungary.
19. Khwaja, M. (2021). Risk-Based Tax Audits, Approaches and Country Experiences. Washington, DC: World Bank.
20. Risk Analysis of Large Taxpayers. (2012). IOTA Report for Tax Administrations.
21. Sun, X., Zhai, S., & Yu, S. (2019). Can Flexible Tax Administration Alleviate Corporate Financial Constraints? Evidence from the Natural Experiment of Tax Credit Rating Disclosure. China Industrial Economy, 03, 81-99 [in Chinese].
22. Galandová, M. (2022). Tax Reliability Index - an Effective Incentive Tool or an Unlawful Concept. Czechia: PRK Partners.
23. Kobakhidze, S. (2023). Tax Risk Assessment and Tax Scoring Reform. Mongolia, Tax and Legal Alert, 02/2023, 1-2. [DOI:10.5089/9798400232558.007]
24. Tax Risk Management Policy. (2023). Accent Group Limited: Corporate Governance Principles and Practices. Retrieved from https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/
25. Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M., Santos-Arteaga, F., & Sharafi, H. (2023). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Match Made in Heaven. Expert Systems with Applications, 223, 119902. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119902]
26. Mousavi Jahromi, Y, Dehghan, S. (2020). Investigating the Behavior of Individual Business Taxpayers: A Behavioral Economics Approach. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2), 265-281.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Tax Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb