Volume 32, Issue 63 (2024)
J Tax Res 2024, 32(63): 220-256 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
azimi A, Rezaei F, zakizadeh M. Presenting a professional judgment model of tax auditors using the grounded theory approach. J Tax Res 2024; 32 (63) :220-256
URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2462-en.html
URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2462-en.html
1- , farzin.rezaei@qiau.ac.ir
Abstract: (401 Views)
The current research seeks to formulate the model of professional judgment of tax auditors with the approach of grounded theory. Since it is expected that the results of this research will be taken into consideration by the managers of the Iranian National Tax Administration, it is among applied research and its nature is exploratory, which is implemented with a qualitative method. Data collection was done by snowball sampling through interviews with 11 tax audit experts in 1402 and then data analysis. Using the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin (1998), the pattern of professional judgment of tax auditors was explained along with its explanatory components, i.e. causal conditions, background conditions, strategies, intervening factors and consequences. In compiling the professional judgment model of tax auditors, 13 causes were selected as causal conditions, the experts emphasized the importance of the quality of documents and documents, the multiplicity of laws and regulations, the auditor's experience, and the auditor's personal characteristics. The central phenomenon of the present research was the professional judgment of tax auditors was identified. Then, according to the conditions of the background and the intervener, strategies related to professional judgment and its consequences have been presented and the final model has been developed based on it.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Management
Received: 2024/12/29 | Accepted: 2024/11/24 | Published: 2024/11/30
Received: 2024/12/29 | Accepted: 2024/11/24 | Published: 2024/11/30
References
1. ابیضی عیسی، محمدزاده سالطه حیدر، اقدم مزرعه یعقوب، نونهال نهر علی اکبر(1400)، تدوین الگوی جامع کیفیت حسابرسی مالیاتی در ایران با استفاده از رویکرد زمینه بنیان، دانش حسابرسی، دوره : 21 - شماره : 83 - صفحه:105 -131.
2. امین، وحید، حیدری، كرامت اله، شعبان پور اومالی، مجتبی (1399)، بررسی تأثیر كمیته حسابرسی بر حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی و حق‌الزحمه خدمات غیرحسابرسی، اولین همایش بین‌المللی چالش‌ها و راهكارهای نوین در مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت و حسابداری، ساری.
3. بهرامی کهیش نژاد، نادر. ( 1394)، عوامل مؤثر بر بهبود کیفیت حسابرسی مالیاتی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس.
4. تهرانی، رضا، عباسیان، عزت اله و آخوندی، احمد(1397)، طراحی مدلی برای پیش بینی خوش حسابی مؤدیان بزرگ مالیاتی. پژوهشنامه مالیات، شماره 38 پیاپی 86 ، ص 11-29.
5. حسین آبادی، جلال الدین، زمانی مزده، مهدی (1393)، بررسی موانع اجرای حسابرسی مالیاتی در ایران (موضوع ماده 272 قانون مالیات های مستقیم)، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، دوره 3(11)، 55-66.
6. سلمانی چنگیز، جبارزاده کنگرلویی سعید، بحری تراح جمال، پاک مرام اصغر، (1399)، مدلی برای پیش بینی قضاوت حرفه ای حسابرسان، تحقیقات حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، دوره 12، شماره 48، صفحه 179-201.
7. طاهری، محمد، جهانگیرنیا، حسین، خان محمدی، محمدحامد و غلامی جمکرانی، رضا ( 1399)، تدوین مدل کیفیت حسابرسی مالیاتی در نظام مالیات بر ارزش افزوده ایران. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت.9(34)،277-298.
8. وطن پرست، محمدرضا، ابراهیمی، محسن، رضائی فرزین و محمدی نوده فاضل (1400)، عوامل اثرگذار بر سوگيري حسابرسان مالياتي در قضاوت هاي حرفه اي، بررسي هاي حسابداري و حسابرسي، ،1400 دوره ،28 شماره ،2 ، 181-205.
9. وطن پرست، محمدرضا، ابراهیمی، محسن، رضائی فرزین،(1400)، طراحی الگوی سوگیری ماموران و حسابرسان مالیاتی با رویکرد مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد، فصلنامه علمي پژوهشي دانش حسابداري و حسابرسي مديريت سال دهم / شماره /39.
10. References
11. Abizi Issa, Mohammadzadeh Saltah Haider, Aghdam Yaqoub Farm, Nonhal Nahar Ali Akbar (2021), Compilation of a comprehensive model of tax audit quality in Iran using the foundational approach, audit knowledge, volume: 21 - number: 83 -page: 131-105(In Persian).
12. Al-Ajmi, Jasim. (2009). "Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain", Advances in International Accounting, Vol. 25, pp 64-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.005]
13. Amin, Vahid, Heydari, Karamat Elah, Shabanpour Omali, Mojtabi (2020), Investigating the impact of the audit committee on audit fees and non-audit services fees, the first international conference on new challenges and solutions in industrial engineering, management and accounting, Sari. (In Persian).
14. Bahrami Kohishnejad, Nader. (2015), effective factors on improving the quality of tax audit. Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University, Quds branch. (In Persian).
15. Belay, Mekonnen (2017). Challenges of tax audit administration in Addis Ababa: evidence from small taxpayer branches, Department of Accounting and Finance School of Business Administration, Saint Mary University.
16. Chalu, H., Mzee, H. (2018). Determinants of tax audit effectiveness in Tanzania. ManagerialAuditing Journal, Vol. 33, ISS. 1, PP. 35-63. [DOI:10.1108/MAJ-06-2016-1390]
17. Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin (2010). Are Family Firms more Tax Aggressive than Nonfamily Firms? Journal of Financia Economics, 95 (1): 41-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003]
18. Christiansen, T, G, 2024, Dynamic effects of tax audits and the role of intentions, Journal of Public Economics, Volume 234, June 2024, 105121,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105121 [DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105121.]
19. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson Publication.
20. Creswell, John W. and Miller, Dana L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, (3)3,124-130. [DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2]
21. Da Silva, F. P., Guerreiro, R., & Flores, E. (2019). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context. International Review of Economics, 66(2), 147-180. [DOI:10.1007/s12232-019-00321-0]
22. Ebrill, Liam P; Keen, Michael; and Victoria Perry. (2010). the Modern VAT. Washington D.C, International Monetary Fund.
23. Hossein Abadi, Jalaluddin, Zamani Mazdeh, Mehdi (2014),Investigating the implementation obstacles of tax audit in Iran (the subject of Article 272 of the Direct Taxes Law), Accounting Knowledge and Management Audit, 33(11), 55-66. (In Persian).
24. Johnson,B. ,& Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 3rd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
25. Kelawole, A. D & Owolabi. O. A. (2021). Tax Audit and Taxpayers' Complionce in SouthWest NIGERIA. Psychology and Education Journal. 58(2), 10246-10254.
26. Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
27. Mansour, I & Kalib, M. (2019). The Impact of Using Analytical Procedures on Reducing the Cost of Tax Audit "The Jordanian Income and Sales Tax Department". International Business Research;Vol. 12, No. 2, PP. 52-65. [DOI:10.5539/ibr.v12n2p52]
28. Nuryaman,T. (2013). The Influence of Corporate Governance Practice on The Company's Financial Performance, Journal of Global Business and Economic, Global Research.Com ISSN, 5: 2180-3625.
29. Salmani, Cengiz, Jabarzadeh Kangarloui Saeed, Bahri Terah Jamal, Pak Meram Asghar, (2020), a model for predicting the professional judgment of auditors, financial accounting and auditing research, volume 12, number 48, page 179-201.. (In Persian).
30. Shkurti, R., Myftaraj, J & Gjika, E. (2021). Use of Financial Ratios in selecting entities for Tax Audit purposes -empirical study in Albania. Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development. 17, 297-313. [DOI:10.37394/232015.2021.17.30]
31. Strauss,A.L.,& Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory: Procedures and Technique. (2nd Edition); Sage, Newbury Park, London.
32. Taheri, Mohammad; Jahangirnia, Hossein; Khan Mohammadi, Mohammad Hamid and Gholami Jamkarani, Reza. (2020), Compilation of the tax audit quality model in Iran's value added tax system, Scientific Research Quarterly No. Knowledge of Management Accounting and Auditing Year 9, No34., page 277-298. (In Persian).
33. Tehrani, Reza, Abbasian, Ezzatolah and Akhundi, Ahmed (2018), Designing a model for predicting the good accounting of large tax payers. Tax Research Quarterly, No. 38 of 86, page 11-29. (In Persian).
34. vatanparast Mohammad Reza, Ebrahimi Mohsen, Rezaei Farzin, (2021), Designing the bias model of agents and tax audits based on foundational data theory, Scientific Research Quarterly No. Knowledge of Management Accounting and Auditing Year 10, No. 39. (In Persian).
35. Vatanparast Mohammadreza, Ebrahimi Mohsaen, Rezaei Farzin, Mohammadi Nodeh Fazel, Investigating the Factors Affecting the Bias of Tax Auditors in Professional Judgments, Accounting and Auditing Review, 2021, Vol. 28, No.2, pp. 181-205, (In Persian).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
